Culture and Cognition Essay

finale may be defined as a combination of disparate traits of a kind group. These traits or ways of life eject be language, arts, sciences, thoughts, spirituality, friendly activities, interactions, and many more than (Definition, n. d. ). The world has many races and thence many tillages, thus each has their cause beliefs, traditions, and customs. Another characteristic of a authorized tillage may be cognition. Because of clement diversity in traditions and customs, there is to a fault diversity in news program. tally to Cole, Gay, Glick, and astutely (as cited in Sternberg, 2004), certain behaviors may be smart in unitary shade but plainly stupid in another (1971). husbandry and acquaintance According to Robert Sternberg in his article entitled Culture and Intelligence, word cannot be full measured, developed, and conceptualized when it is outside the cultural context. This creates an impression that intelligence is a norm and world a deviant from that norm would mean little intelligence (2004, p. 1). An example deemn by Sternberg about intelligence tests shows an evidence of his argument.e actually intelligence test created in ane culture may not be valid in another culture. Sternberg besides constructed models in order to determine if the culture has a significant imprint on intelligence. On the third model, the dimensions of intelligence are the same as with the other models. However, the instruments utilize are different from the other models. The standard change was therefore derived from the culture being studied and not from outside it. As this is d unrivalled, the psychological meanings of the scores of the assessments change from one culture to another. Culture and CognitionIntelligence is just one of the cognitive characteristics of man. Culture, as well as social systems has a role in developing the lots system of thought. This is according to Richard Nisbett, Incheol Choi, Laiping Peng, and genus Ara Norenzayan, when they studied the difference between eastern hemisphereerners and westerners in terms of cognitive processes (2001). They stated that east Asians are holistic in their cognitive processes, focusing on an entire topic and its causality. On the other hand, westerners such as Americans are analytic because they pay more attention on the object and the categories, devising use of rules such as orchis logic.The authors of this article suggest that the origin of these differences is trackable to different social systems (p. 291). They were able to end that there is still a very great difference between cultures. It is because of the batch brought about by these cultures that one process ordain always be different from another. Furthermore, the norms or the prescriptive standards for though will differ across cultures (p. 306). The influence of culture has many implications in cognition. This insight may change the very definition of intelligence as related to different social s ystems.This also has a great effect in cognitive assessment since one measuring tool may not be appropriate for all cultures. Although internationalistic communication is already established, this information would give more understanding to people as to how others with different cultures are different to them in terms of learning styles, perception, and other aspects of cognition. It would also change the perception on people who are considered as intellectually outclassed since intelligence no longer focuses on a dominant or normative standard set by those perceive as superior.References Definition of Culture, (n. d. ). Roshan Culture Heritage Institute. Retrieved 24 May 2010 from http//www. roshan-institute. org/templates/ frame/details. asp? id=39783&PID =474552. Nisbett, R. E. , Peng, K. , Choi, I. , & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and Systems of estimate Holistic versus Analytic Cognition. psychological Review. 108(2), pp. 291-310. Sternberg, R. (2004). Culture and Intell igence. American Psychologist. 59(5), pp. 325- 338.