Monday, February 4, 2019
The Flea Essay -- English Literature Essays
The FleaDonnes poem The Flea appears to be a love poem, a fealty from a male suitor to his lady of honor, who repudiates to yield to his full-blooded desires. In this poem, the speaker tries to seduce a young woman by equivalence the consequences of their lovemaking with those of an insignificant fleabite. He uses the flea as an argument to typify that the visible relationship he desires is non in itself a significant event, because a similar unification has already taken built in bed inside the flea. In the stanza 1, the speaker creates likeness between the fleabite and lovemaking. I interpreted the prototypical cardinal lines, Mark but this flea, and mark in this, How little that, which grand piano cut acrossst me, is to mean that the woman doesnt reject the flea entre to her body, save she denies the advancements of the speaker. because the speaker shows the similarities between their lovemaking and the mingling of their blood at heart the flea. It sucked me first, and now sucks thee, And in this flea our two bloods mingled be. This argument shows the woman that the same sensible exchange, which takes place between her and a flea, is the same type of union that he has in mind. In lines 5-6 of stanza 1 the speaker persuades the woman that their act could non be considered a sin because a fleabite isnt considered one. This act could not be considered a loss of innocence because it is so common that if it were to be true, just about everyone would have lost his or her innocence. Therefore this lady... The Flea Essay -- slope Literature EssaysThe FleaDonnes poem The Flea appears to be a love poem, a dedication from a male suitor to his lady of honor, who repudiates to yield to his lustful desires. In this poem, the speaker tries to seduce a young woman by comparing the consequences of their lovemaking with those of an insignificant fleabite. He uses the flea as an argument to exemplify that the physical relationship he desires is not in itself a momentous event, because a similar unification has already taken place within the flea. In the stanza 1, the speaker creates likeness between the fleabite and lovemaking. I interpreted the first two lines, Mark but this flea, and mark in this, How little that, which thou denyst me, is to mean that the woman doesnt reject the flea entre to her body, yet she denies the advancements of the speaker. Then the speaker shows the similarities between their lovemaking and the mingling of their blood within the flea. It sucked me first, and now sucks thee, And in this flea our two bloods mingled be. This argument shows the woman that the same physical exchange, which takes place between her and a flea, is the same type of union that he has in mind. In lines 5-6 of stanza 1 the speaker persuades the woman that their act could not be considered a sin because a fleabite isnt considered one. This act could not be considered a loss of innocence because it is so common that if i t were to be true, nearly everyone would have lost his or her innocence. Therefore this lady...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment